| TrueCombat http://truecombat.net/forums/ |
|
| TCE weaponry http://truecombat.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=852 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | -Aequitas- [ Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | TCE weaponry |
Well this is how I think the weapons inventory should be… --SPEC OPS-- ASSAULT: Rifles: M4 FN Scar-L Ag 36c SOPMOD Benelli M3 Mossberg M590 Pistols: Beretta92 SOCOM Grenades: XM84 MK23 M83 RECON: Submachineguns: MP5 MP5 sd HK UMP HK UMP sd Pistols: Beretta92 Beretta92 sd Grenades: XM84 MK23 M83 SNIPER: SniperRilfes: PSG-1 93 LSR2 SPR Pistols: Beretta92 SOCOM Grenades: XM84 MK23 M83 --TERRORIST-- ASSAULT: Rilfes: AK47 SIG 552 AK 74M sd IMI Galil -> http://world.guns.ru/assault/as23-e.htm Mossberg M590 SPASS12 Pistols: Glock17 Desert Eagle Grenades: XM84 MK23 M83 RECON: Submachineguns: Mac 10 Mac 10 sd AK 74U AK 74U sd Pistols: Glock17 Glock17 sd Grenades: XM84 MK23 M83 SNIPER: SniperRifles: M76 Remington SR-8 SIG 550 Pistol: Glock17 Desert Eagle Grenades: XM84 MK23 M83 |
|
| Author: | XenoKiLLer [ Sun Aug 13, 2006 12:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
well I can see the trouble that you have gone through to put that list together but those server admins will alway just make every weapon available to everyone to creat the CS like arcade environment. |
|
| Author: | -Aequitas- [ Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ya I know it’s just that I wanted to add some weapons and take some off. The m16 I think should be removed. The Recons (both terrors and spec ops) shouldn’t have shotguns, so I put them in assault. The AG36C and the FN_SCAR are definitely not terror weapons so I think they should be spec ops weapons. To bring balance to the terrors I think the GALI should be added to the Assault team. And I saw UMP’s silenced in the rainbow six series so I think it should be added to the recon team (spec ops). The MARK23 is without a doubt a spec ops gun, so I think it should be added ( there is not enough handguns in TCE, some people think there useless but they aren’t, when used at the right time and the right place you can get a couple of kills.) Anyways this is just all my own opinion. |
|
| Author: | fixception [ Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
1) Please take out the UMP45SD, unless the AA system is refined and in use. Otherwise either the UMP45SD or the MP5SD will generally be ignored by players. It's just like some of those servers that modified the M16 to the automatic M16A4 and then nobody uses the M4's anymore. 2) Balance out the silenced pistols, please. 3) Is the AK-74M silenced? 4) I think it's high time that the Desert Eagle be removed...it's a hand cannon that no armed forces use in real life. However, it might be interesting if we give the terrorists the Deagle and the SpecOps another specialty pistol like a heavily accessorized SOCOM (which is planned) or the Five-SeveN. 5) There has been debate about replacing the M76 with the SVD, and I'm siding with the SVD if it doesn't involve a lot of work. 6) Spelling: PSG-1 7) The one thing that bothered me is that the SIG552 is a shortened version of the SIG550...which would make it more appropriate as a Scout class weapon. Has anyone brought that up before? |
|
| Author: | -Aequitas- [ Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Why take off the mp5 SD and the ump SD, if people don’t like them then just don’t use them. But you’re right about this -> *However, it might be interesting if we give the terrorists the Deagle and the SpecOps another specialty pistol like a heavily accessorized SOCOM (which is planned) or the Five-SeveN.* |
|
| Author: | XenoKiLLer [ Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Heavily accessorized might be too much for what can be allocated and used for gameplay. Yet for something different a silenced pistol will work too. |
|
| Author: | fixception [ Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
XenoKiLLer wrote: Heavily accessorized might be too much for what can be allocated and used for gameplay. Yet for something different a silenced pistol will work too.
Well...I was thinking somewhere along the lines of silencer + laser sight, period. I didn't mean scopes...that'd be ridiculous. |
|
| Author: | -Aequitas- [ Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
If there will be a laser sight in 0.49 it should only be for the pistols. |
|
| Author: | XenoKiLLer [ Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
thats fine. but the laser sights arent necessary except when you plan to use akimbo. |
|
| Author: | Silentcrisis [ Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Laser sights have to be the dumbest *i-need-a-broader-vocab* idea every creating to be equipped with a firearm. It's next to useless, unless your too lazy to use a scope. ~Silentcrisis |
|
| Author: | XenoKiLLer [ Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
basically those are used for slower projectiles like rockets, grenades, etc. Uses for guns are more for close quarters where there isnt enough room to aim using the sights. |
|
| Author: | Silentcrisis [ Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well, I can understand that. But adding a Laser Sight to your SOCOM Pistol is only going to give away your position. ~Silentcrisis |
|
| Author: | Shiro013 [ Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Umm, is that a want list, or our current list? Because Is eriously want the Galil |
|
| Author: | XenoKiLLer [ Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
thats just the want list. What is so different from a Galil and an AK? they are probably just the "same thing a bit different." |
|
| Author: | it [ Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
XenoKiLLer wrote: thats just the want list. What is so different from a Galil and an AK? they are probably just the "same thing a bit different."
it's more like the SCAR... http://world.guns.ru/assault/as23-e.htm I"m mixed. I frankly don't care as long as it won't mean another 2 years between releases. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|